Skip to content
LeicesterCountsLeicester, in numbers.Local help →

Leicester · England

Issues

Leicester council area. Every figure carries its own date.

Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats drawn from the available evidence. These are analytical judgements, not an official council assessment. Where a national comparison is available, lower housing costs, lower reported poor health and higher qualification shares are treated as relative strengths; this does not prove affordability or service quality.

Strengths

strength

Make accessible housing work for its residents

The first Saffron Lane homes are designed for wheelchair users.

Proposed response: Check that handover, allocation and support preserve the intended accessibility.

Evidence

What could help →

strength

Make room for homes people can afford

Average private rent is £1,023 a month (August 2026) in Leicester council area. This is £436 lower than the England average for the same month. Homes rented privately ranged from 12.2% in Thurncourt to 63% in Westcotes — a gap of 50.8 percentage points.

Housing costs matter most alongside earnings and the number of affordable homes available. A local average cannot tell us whether a particular household can afford its home.

What could help →

Weaknesses

weakness

Bring support closer to people in poor health

5.2% of people reported bad or very bad health in Leicester council area (21 March 2021). Across England, the figure was 5.2%. People reporting bad or very bad health ranged from 3.1% in Castle to 7.5% in Eyres Monsell — a gap of 4.4 percentage points.

This is how residents described their health in the census. It can reveal differences between neighbourhoods, but does not diagnose illness or measure current waiting times. Age profiles differ between places, so these shares do not measure service quality.

What could help →

Opportunities

opportunity

Make the station’s revised procurement visible

Leicester station’s revamp has a revised funding announcement after an earlier tender found no development partner.

Proposed response: Clarify the decisions and procurement steps needed before the revised scheme can be delivered.

What could help →

opportunity

Plan homes and care around an older population

11.8% of people in Leicester council area were aged 65 or over (21 March 2021). People aged 65 or over ranged from 4.6% in Castle to 19% in Knighton — a gap of 14.4 percentage points.

Age alone does not mean poor health or a need for care. Accessible homes, reliable transport and support close to home matter as people get older.

What could help →

opportunity

Connect local skills to local opportunities

26.8% of people aged 16 or over had a degree or equivalent (21 March 2021) in Leicester council area. Across England, the figure was 33.9%. People aged 16+ with no qualifications ranged from 8.2% in Castle to 42.1% in Belgrave — a gap of 33.9 percentage points.

Qualifications show one part of the skills available locally. They do not show whether people have secure jobs or work that uses those skills.

What could help →

opportunity

Target safety work where problems repeat

Mapped police records are available for neighbourhoods in Leicester council area.

Published locations are approximate and some crimes are not mapped. Counts show recorded incidents, not the chance of an individual becoming a victim.

What could help →

opportunity

Turn published plans into visible progress

3 named local projects or plans have official evidence in this collection.

A published plan makes responsibilities and intentions easier to inspect. It does not prove that funding is secured or that promised benefits have arrived.

What could help →

opportunity

Target support where disadvantages overlap

Households facing two or more measured disadvantages ranged from 13.5% in Knighton to 38.6% in Wycliffe — a gap of 25.1 percentage points.

These households met at least two census conditions covering education, employment, health and housing. This is not an income or poverty measure.

What could help →

Threats

The evidence gathered here does not yet support a distinct finding in this category.

Which response goes with each issue?